Commonly referred to as, the "Scandal of our Generation"
Amidst today's "tossed" supportive data; many questions remain.
Interesting "Climategate email" Press release: HERE.
One of the leaked climate emails was apparently a press release from “Earth Government” Newsletter dated 27 Mar 2003... The document calls for a ‘democratic’ world government that would amalgamate and reform the prevailing global institutions including the United Nations, IMF, World Bank WTO, NAFTA, FTAA and others "for the good of all."
They cheated Her Majesty, who clearly believed their sincerity.
And this alone, shall be completely unforgivable...
Email refers to an “Earth Court of Justice to deal with all aspects of the Governance and Management of the Earth.” The document also makes mention of the "Foundation for the new world order, Earth Government"...
..."The splitting of America into separate independent
states living at peace for the good of all?"
Already done!... (But email is 2003, not 1773.)
Weird science: East Anglia CRU threw out their raw data #
When would scientists expecting the world to take them seriously throw out the raw data on which their conclusions are based? Read more.
And... Over Eleven million articles for "climategate" on the Net; and an Obama Media News search, comes up with nothing...
View Image [ENLARGE!]
"Is this a revelation of the true intentions of certain environmental advocates, or just one of many emails in the background of calls to “hide the decline” of global temperatures (despite intense claims of global warming)."
UPDATE: More from aceHQ: CRU agrees to release all data: read.
Easy Explanation of "Real Science" VIEW.
Showing how much of the "Greenhouse Effect" is caused by human activity.
NOTE: It's about 0.28%, if water vapor is taken into account..
...And about 5.53%, if not.
EPA Seeks To Have Water Vapor Classified As A Pollutant
by the ecoEnquirer, 2006
Alternate link: [PDF]
CO2 and why Carbon Trading won’t work: HERE.
-"Cap and trade…is almost perfectly designed for the buying and selling of political support through the granting of valuable emissions permits to favor specific industries and even specific Congressional districts. That is precisely what is taking place now in the House Energy and Commerce Committee…”
– New York Times (05/17/09)