A neighbor e-mailed several pictures from an unusual freeze of the early 19th century: "Niagara Falls Freeze-over of 1911"...(Consistent temperatures of the last 100 years, as reflected in Global Warmists' satellite climate models?)
He also sent this link: Is Global Warmingism A Cult? 
And check this out...Evidently the sun is a "no fault zone" as Warmists are not willing to "further examine current Scientific Data" and dismiss:
Relate-ability concerning Sun's Effect on Earth
amidst Solar System as... 'just a coincidence'!"In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row."
Space Weather Could Scrub Manned Mars Mission"Eruptions in the sun's atmosphere can send blasts of radiation toward the Earth and beyond. These massive explosions are millions of times stronger than that of a nuclear bomb, and experts warn that such solar storms could jeopardize plans for a manned mission to Mars."
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human,
Cause for Warming, Scientist Says"By studying fluctuations in the warmth of the sun, Abdussamatov believes he can see a pattern that fits with the ups and downs in climate we see on Earth and Mars... Abdussamatov's work, however, has not been well received by other climate scientists"...
4 comments:
wow. amazing picture! I added the "Newer" link in your template, Manessa.
Hey...Great addition... And thanks!
(double thank you.)
:D
Nice pic. Seems that some are dropping the "warming" part and falling back to climate change. An example would be one kid who responded to my note of large amounts of snow by bringing up drought conditions in other states. Kind of dodges the point about it being C O L D enough for the precipitation to be snow.
Hey Mark, Thanks...:) You are correct...And when these groups try to scare us, instead of apply honesty; they loose a majority, from scepticism...
Instead of trying to authenticate unproven science, all they need to express is: "Due to the limited scientific data, we need money from greater developed nations for "exploration science"...For conversion of salt-water sources, reduction of emissions, and development of food resources, in the event that poorer regions might be impacted." Everyone would go with it...
Lessoning a potential burden is not the same thing as using "unproven" prediction models and "earthly chaos" to scare; while making claims like "most major impacts on human welfare would be avoided" (They need to be "up-front.")
Post a Comment